Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Recent Posts
Charlie at the San Diego Pastors Summit
|
In his speech to the Pastors Summit in San Diego three years ago, Charlie lays out the great divide between pagan thought and Judeo-Christian beliefs, and predicts one of the issues that would prove decisive in turning the tide against the woke plague ahead of the 2024 election: The fanatical desire of predatory adults to give sex changes to children.
THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 124 — The Great Tattoo Debate? Save Spirit Airlines? British Smoking Ban?
|
The Thoughtcrime team addresses supremely important questions like:
-Are tattoos tolerable, or terrible?
-Are British Boomers pulling up the ladder by banning cigarettes?
-Should the government let Spirit Airlines die?
From the Archive: Charlie vs. The University of Illinois on Abortion
|
Is some weird metaphor about a violinist an irrefutable argument against the pro-life position? Probably not, but a student at the University of Illinois tried it on Charlie and it didn’t go well for him. In this dive back into the debate archive, Charlie battles Illinois students on the topic his debated more than any other, the right to life.
Dismantling the Antifa/NGO Alliance + AMA 263 – AD FREE
|
Two weeks have passed since TPUSA Frontlines reporter Savanah Hernandez was assaulted covering anti-ICE goons in Minneapolis, but her attackers still aren’t facing state charges. Savanah joins the show for the first time since the attack, and then DOJ’s Harmeet Dhillon talks about her office’s efforts taking on left-wing violence, woke AI, the SPLC, and more. Then Danny joins for an hour of subscriber questions, including:
-What did Charlie think of nuclear power?
-Is Chip Roy sufficiently MAGA?
-What groups should DOJ target next after the SPLC?
it’s dangerous to accuse them of the truth!
Yet we are the threat to democracy?
@ Megyn Kelly the obvious makes no sense? That was a death threat if I’ve ever heard one. She is saying flat out how dare you question the regime…. We can end you for that is basically what she said, I’ve studied psychology for a short time and sociology she is threatening him from a position of power that they can end him for asking that however they see fit. Death to his career or maybe even to him. That’s only watching her and studying this outside of a school setting. That sigh of disgust you heard that’s an attitude of I’m done with this already. She fully believes her lies and her rhetoric is validated although we know it’s the driving force behind all of this.