Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Recent Posts
The Conservative Movement After 9/10: The Path Forward
|
In this exclusive live episode from AmFest, Michael Knowles joins the show for a wide-ranging conversation on the state of the conservative movement and what comes next in the aftermath of 9/10. He breaks down the cultural and political challenges ahead and outlines how conservatives should think strategically about the future.
Michael also addresses the dominant online narratives surrounding Israel and Palestine, offering clarity on how digital discourse is shaping public opinion. The episode concludes with a live Q&A, where he answers questions on Christianity, free speech, and offers practical advice for students navigating campus culture today.
Why President Trump Trusted Charlie ft. Donald Trump Jr.
|
President Trump has millions of supporters and thousands of people desperate for his ear. So, why did he put so much trust in Charlie, and turn to him over and over for advice? Donald Trump Jr. was a front-row witness to that fruitful relationship, and in his CK Exclusives interview at AmFest he explains how Charlie could offer the president something few others did: Honest advice instead of flattery, and a deep, intuitive understanding of the MAGA base.
A Look Back: The Best Clips of Charlie’s 2025
|
Charlie’s death robbed America and the conservative movement of one of its greatest […]
“Chasing Pirates” in Minnesota: Exposing the Tim Walz Fraud ft. Nick Shirley – AD FREE
|
Nick Shirley joins the show to talk about the gargantuan volume of daycare fraud and other theft from taxpayers by Minnesota’s Somali community, all while Tim Walz called anybody looking into it a white supremacist. Tricia McLaughlin of DHS explains how the Trump Administration is getting involved, including the possible use of denaturalization to strip criminal immigrants of citizenship.
Speaking to minute 27 about merit-based pay for teachers. As an educator, I agree with the concept of merit-based pay, but there are potential flaws in this concept with regards to the types of classrooms that some teachers work in. For example, in Bay County, Florida around 2012, they had something similar to this. In the complex formula, that no one really understood, in penalized teachers that worked with students with IEP’s. The formula used standardized scores from the state assessment as a large percentage of the teacher’s score. In a lot of cases, teacher’s could show tremendous growth for students on an IEP using a standards-based portfolios, but some students were still functioning below grade level and scored below-proficiency on the state assessment. The “formula” did not take into account those circumstances for teachers serving students that were known to be functioning below grade level, and therefore, those teachers were docked points on their performance score, which at that time in Bay County could affect their step increase in pay. Penalizing teachers that work with the academic and behaviorally challenging students based off standardized state assessments had a negative impact on teacher retention in the county. So, all that to be said, I whole-heartedly agree with merit-based pay if it uses fair measurement tools that do not penalize quality educators working with our most challenging students.